Nationalist Shift in Modern East Asia

소개

전근대 동아시아의 국제체제(조공책봉체제)가 서구 주권국가 체제로의 전환, 편입하는 과정에서 민족주의, 민족자결주의 개념의 도입이 수행한 역할을 분석한 보고서입니다.

목차

I. Introduction

II. Theory and Definitions
1. International systems and international society
2. Nationalism

III. History of East Asian International Society
1. Birth of imperial order
2. Rise of nationalism

IV. Conclusion

References

본문내용

I. Introduction
Nationalism used to be deemed no more relevant during the Cold War, but the War is long gone, and nationalism, or national identity in a broader sense, returned as a significant determinant of foreign, as well as other, policies. A few years after the end of Cold War, based on theoretical basis of William Bloom (1990), Ilya Prizel (1998) illustrated the importance of nationalism and national identity in East-Central European countries. Not only that, it is a commonsense that the regional order in East Asia is ‘still’ influenced by nationalisms in each country. What is more, the leaders in East Asia, that is President Park of Korea, Prime Minister Abe of Japan, General Secretary Xi of China, dictator Kim of North Korea, are stubborn nationalist.
Given such circumstances, to properly understand the current situation and to foresee and prepare for the future of the region, it is of crucial importance to understand East Asian international order first.

참고자료

· Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.
· Bloom, W. (1990). Personal identity, national identity and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
· Bull, H. (2012). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
· Chen, Z. (2005). Nationalism, internationalism and Chinese foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary China 14(42), 35-53.
· Duara, P. (2005). The legacy of empires and nations in East Asia. In P. Nyíri, & J. Breidenbach, China inside out: Contemporary Chinese nationalism and transnationalism (pp. 35-54). Budapest: Central European University Press.
· Eto, S. (2005 [1980]). Asianism and the duality of Japanese colonialism, 1879-1945. In S. Eto, Selected wroks on modern Japan-China relations (pp. 163-177). Tokyo: The Koyo Bunko.
· Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University.
· Hobsbawm, E. J. (1996 [1992]). Ethnicity and Nationalism in Europe Today. In G. Balakrishnan, Mapping the Nation (pp. 255-266). London: Verso.
· Jeon, S.-s. (2009). Pariganhwahoeuiwa yaksominzokui dokribmunje [Paris Peace Conference and the issue of independence of the people of a small and weak power]. Journal of Korean Modern and Contemporary History 50, 7-36.
· Kang, J. W. (2013). Daehanminguk Minjok seosasi: Jongjokjeok minjokjuuiui jeongaewa geu dayanghan eolgul [The epic of the Republic of Korea's Minjok: The development of ethnic nationalism and its faces]. Korean Journal of Sociology 47(1), 185-219.
· Kim, K.-h. (1980). The last phase of the East Asian world order. California: University of California Press.
· Lee, J.-M. (2010). Choso˘ n Korea as Sojunghwa, the small central civilization: Sadae kyorin policy and relations with Ming/Qing China and Tokugawa Japan in the seventeenth century. 国際基督教大学学報、3-A, アジア文化研究 = International Christian University Publications, 3-A, Asian Cultural Studies 36, 315-318. Retrieved June 16, 2016, from http://id.nii.ac.jp/1130/00002825/
· Manela, E. (2009). The "Wilsonian moment" in East Asia: The March First Movement in global perspective. Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies. Vol. 9, No. 1., 11-27.
· Prizel, I. (1998). National identity and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
· Yongjin, Z., & Buzan, B. (2012). The tributary system as international society in theory and practice. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 5, 3-36.