What response would you make as a film historian to the three fallibilities identified by Gertude Himmelfrab?

소개

What response would you make as a film historian to the three fallibilities identified by Gertude Himmelfrab?

목차

없음

본문내용

Film history involves the study of the phenomenon we commonly refer to as “film”(or cinema, the movies, motion pictures…etc). It involves studying film from a particular perspective and with particular goals in mind – perspective and goals that are historical. Every piece of film historical writing, no matter how modest, implicitly is based on a set of assumptions about history.

참고자료

· References
· Michael Marino, “Bloody But Not History: What’s Wrong with Saving Private Ryan,“ Film 4 History: Film Reviews, http://h-net2.msu.edu/~filmhis/ryan.html.
· This example and the quote from James J. Walsh, retired sergeant, are drawn from Laurent Ditmann, “Made You Look:Towards a Critical Evaluation of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan.” Film 4 History 28.3-4(1998):66
· Robert A.Rosenstone, “The Future of the Past: Film and the Beginnings of Postmoder History,” in Vivian Sobchack, ed., The Persistence of History: Cinema, Television, and the Modern Event (New York: Routledge, 1996), 2006
· Hayden White, “The Modernist Evant,” in Vivian Sobcahack, ed., The Persistence of History. See also, Hayden White, “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth,” in Saul Friedlander, ed., Probing the Limits of representation: Nazism and the “final Solution”(Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992).
· Hayden White, “Historical Emplotment,” 52.
· Hayden White, “The Modernist Evant,”, 20, 22-23.
· Hayden White, “The Modernist Evant,”, 19