Classical and neo realism in International Relations Theories

소개

본 Essay는 제가 런던정경대(London School of Economics & Political Science)의 국제관계학 석사 과정 시 작성했던 Essay이며, 70점 이상을 받았던 Essay 입니다. (일반적으로 70점 이상은 전체 학생의 5~10%에게 부여)
Essay Question 은 What is the difference between classical realism and neo(or structural) realism? 이며 편의상 Classical and Neo realism in International Relations Theories는 제목으로 바꿔서 올립니다.

참고로 제 Essay 및 논문을 표절의 형식으로 사용하시지 않길 요청드리며, idea generation 의 참고자료로 사용하시길 부탁드립니다

목차

I. Introduction
II. Role of the Concept of Anarchy in Evaluating Each Theory
III. Level of Analysis
IV. Power and the Balance of Power
V. View on Unit level, Ideological and Moral Factors
VI. Conclusion

본문내용

I have, so far, referred to the differences between traditional realism and neo-realism based on the works of Hans Morgenthau and Kenneth Waltz. Firstly, while traditional realism highlights the concept of the state as a unitary and rational actor, neo-realism, adding to traditional realist core concept of state, regards the international political structure as the most significant determinant in the realm of international politics.
Secondly, for traditional realism, ideological and moral factors are regarded as important not in the sense that they are driving factors in shaping world politics but in the sense that they are important sources of national power. By contrast, neo-realism takes systemic approach and argues that the sub-national level seems to be of little importance since states’ behaviour is more likely to be determined by structural constraints rather than actions of units.
Thirdly, whereas traditional realism thinks of power as an ultimate aim, neo-realism sees it as a useful means for survival or domination in the distribution of power.
All things considered, the basic assumption which distinguishes neo-realism from traditional realism is thought to be its emphasis upon the structural constraints upon states’ behaviour, since the differences in the concept of power, the role of unit-level, ideological factors and moral principles seem to stem from the neo-realist view of the importance of system.

참고자료

· Brown, Chris. Understanding International Relations, 2nd edition, London : Palgrave, 2001.
· Evans, Graham. & Newnham, Jefferey. The Penguin Dictionary of International Relations, London : Penguin Books, 1998.
· Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, edited by Richard Tucks, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1996.
· Jervis, Robert. “Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation”, World Politics 40, no. 3 (1988).
· Kegley Jr, Charles. W. & Wittkopf, Eugene. R. World Politics : Trend and Formation, 4th edition, Boston : Macmillan Press Ltd, 1999.
· Morgenthau, Hans. Politics among Nations : The Struggle for Power and Peace, Brief edition, USA : McGraw-Hill, 1993.
· Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State and War : A Theoretical Analysis, New York : Columbia University Press : 2001.
· Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics, New York : Random House, 1979.
· Waltz, Kenneth. “Realist Thought and Neo-realist Theory” in Controversies in International Theory : Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge, New York : St.Martin’s Press, 1995.