PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

1951년 한국 장로교 분열의 진상 (Reconsideration of the Schism of the Korean Presbyterian Church in 1951)

39 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.03.28 최종저작일 2007.07
39P 미리보기
1951년 한국 장로교 분열의 진상
  • 서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국교회사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 한국교회사학회지 / 20호 / 157 ~ 195페이지
    · 저자명 : 양낙홍

    초록

    The truths regarding the division of the Korean Presbyterian Church in 1951 has never been thoroughly and fairly disclosed by serious historical study. Existing studies on this topic seems to have the common weaknesses of pariality and fragmantariness. They tend to repeat the traditional theses of their own groups.
    A lot of statements, reports, petitions were issued at that time to defend the positions of each side related to that presbyterian conflicts. Nevertheless those materials have never been sufficiently analysed. This essay aims to reveal the logics and arguements of each party in the process of presbyterian division in 1951. By doing that, I want to show, firstly, the bases on which the readers can judge which party was responsible for the division, or how much responsibilities each side should take for the schism. But my ultimate purpose for this study is not to judge and condemn the wrong party but to provide the basis on which the concerned parties can find the reasons for repentance and reconciliation.
    The ex-prisoners seems to have had some misunderstanding in that they had the lawful right to discipline the shrine worshippers under the Japanese occupation. Because of that presumption they could not accept the presbyterian leaders as their fellow workers in the erection of the seminary who did not follow the prescriptions they laid out. The ex-shrine worshippers, i. e., the absolute majority of the general assembly, had the impression that the ex-prisoners were self-righteous and spiritually arrogant. So they were not willing to cooperate with them in the work of training the ministerial candidates. They even unauthorized the Korea seminary the ex-prisoners founded. This negative attitude of the general assembly toward the Korea Seminary influenced the Kyongnam Presbytery and the latter also cancelled their authorization of the seminary.
    Infuriated, Rev. Sangdong Han suggested that Rev. Kilchang Kim should be removed from the roll of the Kyongnam Presbytery on the ground of betrayal of his faith under the Japanese rule through such ways as shrine worship and Misogibarai. This was the crucial point when the whole of the presbyterian leaders in Korea felt that Han proclaimed a war against them who all worshipped in the shrine. Intimidated Kim went out of the existing presbytery and organized an illegitimate presbytery on his own. When the general assembly intervened to solve the problem of Kyongnam presbytery, instead of, first, reprimanding and commanding Kim to return to the original presbytery, the special commission of the general assembly organized a new Kyongnam presbytery without ex-prisoners group. In this way, the ex-prisonser's group, or the Korea Seminary group was excluded from the Presbyterian Church and origanized their own church next year.

    영어초록

    The truths regarding the division of the Korean Presbyterian Church in 1951 has never been thoroughly and fairly disclosed by serious historical study. Existing studies on this topic seems to have the common weaknesses of pariality and fragmantariness. They tend to repeat the traditional theses of their own groups.
    A lot of statements, reports, petitions were issued at that time to defend the positions of each side related to that presbyterian conflicts. Nevertheless those materials have never been sufficiently analysed. This essay aims to reveal the logics and arguements of each party in the process of presbyterian division in 1951. By doing that, I want to show, firstly, the bases on which the readers can judge which party was responsible for the division, or how much responsibilities each side should take for the schism. But my ultimate purpose for this study is not to judge and condemn the wrong party but to provide the basis on which the concerned parties can find the reasons for repentance and reconciliation.
    The ex-prisoners seems to have had some misunderstanding in that they had the lawful right to discipline the shrine worshippers under the Japanese occupation. Because of that presumption they could not accept the presbyterian leaders as their fellow workers in the erection of the seminary who did not follow the prescriptions they laid out. The ex-shrine worshippers, i. e., the absolute majority of the general assembly, had the impression that the ex-prisoners were self-righteous and spiritually arrogant. So they were not willing to cooperate with them in the work of training the ministerial candidates. They even unauthorized the Korea seminary the ex-prisoners founded. This negative attitude of the general assembly toward the Korea Seminary influenced the Kyongnam Presbytery and the latter also cancelled their authorization of the seminary.
    Infuriated, Rev. Sangdong Han suggested that Rev. Kilchang Kim should be removed from the roll of the Kyongnam Presbytery on the ground of betrayal of his faith under the Japanese rule through such ways as shrine worship and Misogibarai. This was the crucial point when the whole of the presbyterian leaders in Korea felt that Han proclaimed a war against them who all worshipped in the shrine. Intimidated Kim went out of the existing presbytery and organized an illegitimate presbytery on his own. When the general assembly intervened to solve the problem of Kyongnam presbytery, instead of, first, reprimanding and commanding Kim to return to the original presbytery, the special commission of the general assembly organized a new Kyongnam presbytery without ex-prisoners group. In this way, the ex-prisonser's group, or the Korea Seminary group was excluded from the Presbyterian Church and origanized their own church next year.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 04월 13일 일요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
6:59 오후