L'icône, l'hypoicône et la métaphore: L'avancée dans l'hypoicône jusqu'à la frontière du non conceptualisable

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국영상문화학회
· 수록지 정보 : 영상문화 / 14호 / 7 ~ 45페이지
· 저자명 : 장 피제트

초록

After briefly defining the central notion of icon in its relations to the
three phaneroscopic categories, the author deals more specifically with
the hypoicons: the image, the diagram, and the metaphor. As a result of
that analysis, it appears that the metaphor-trope should rather be
understood as pertaining to the logic of the diagram. Metaphor, given
under the hypoicon analysis, is defined as an inference that registers a
discovery process announcing an object not yet conceptualizable.
Referring to the historic context of the Lowell Conferences of 1903, the
author is led to recognize the strangeness of the definition of metaphor,
which, because of contradictions acknowledged by Peirce himself, does
not fit into the conception of the first semiotics. The author, therefore,
interprets this proposition made by Peirce as an exploratory advancement,
or as a leap forward opening the way to the elaboration of the second
semiotics, of which the central concept -the nonfulfillement of the sign,
the “would be”, the “semiosis ad infinitum”- perfectly integrates this
notion of metaphor. Brought closer to the epistemological positions
historically attributed to Nietzsche- a contemporary of Peirce -, and also
to those of the surrealists -whose advent was near-metaphor is thought
in a logic belonging as much to the order of the cognition as to that of
the aesthetics.

참고자료

· 없음