This essay furst attempts to study in the main two major publications: one is R.F. Foster’s great biographical work and the other David Pierce’s good book, which is scholarly and looks beautiful as well, and then will ask a question: what’s the purpose of these books? What does Yeats really look for: perfection of a life or art? We now have excellent biographical and critical works of Yeats and his work. We have scholars and biographers and poets that could have their say in the matter of Yeats’s life and/or work. Of them, Richard Ellmann seems to be the strongest biographer scholar who could both look into Yeats and his work, and feel what Yeats’s work is; R.F. Foster’s unique eye as a historian helps our eye look into what Yeats has done in his life; T.R. Henn’s approach, for example, seems straightforward as he deals with Yeats as poet and with his poems in depth without going astray very much. Other biographers and scholars have works as valuable as the three above. I would also like to deal with some scholars writing and editing Yeats’s poems as their needs arise. Some, however, seem to have bent and cut Yeats’s poems to fit them into their purposes, without knowing what harm this could do Yeats and his poetry, which. I would point to. My aim here is not that I serve as a judge of their work, but would like to put Yeats’s work into a proper dimension. Yeats as Modern poet seems to have been misunderstood or underestimated as Modern poet, when we label him as a Last Romantic, the term Yeats himself has first coined.
자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
파일오류
중복자료
저작권 없음
설명과 실제 내용 불일치
파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우