· 발행기관 : 충북대학교 법학연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 과학기술과 법 / 11권 / 2호 / 61 ~ 94페이지
· 저자명 : 마광, 상익비
When the balance of personal data, cross-border data flow and national interests has become a global consensus, China’s protection of personal data in international trade is still at the preliminary exploration stage. Through analysis of the current status of domestic legislation and foreign practices, China’s The dilemma of China’s personal data protection position is unclear, which is manifested in the conflict between data localization and data liberalization, unbalanced personal data, cross-border data flow, and conflicts between national interests, incomplete domestic governance mechanisms, and foreign trade individuals The problem of limited data protection effectiveness. Therefore, the thesis hopes to find answers to the plight of personal data protection in international trade from the legislation and external experience of the European Union and the United States. Based on the current situation in China, on the basis of drawing on the experience of the European and American models, the thesis mainly studies two goals, namely, on the one hand, it establishes the overall position of China's participation in the protection of personal data in international trade, and on the other hand, it is a better implement your ideas in international trade and provide countermeasures and suggestions. Therefore, on the macro level, China should adopt a trade-led protection strategy based on data sovereignty based on national interests, implement different standards of personal data protection measures in terms of national interests, commercial interests, and individual legal rights. Provide relevant suggestions, such as narrowing the scope of application of the “assessment method” security assessment, clarifying the specific scope of key information infrastructure, etc., and clarifying the national position in external practice, by participating in WTO rules, strengthening bilateral and multilateral cooperation, etc. China’s voice is voiced in the formulation of international rules to safeguard China’s national interests.
When the balance of personal data, cross-border data flow and national interests has become a global consensus, China’s protection of personal data in international trade is still at the preliminary exploration stage. Through analysis of the current status of domestic legislation and foreign practices, China’s The dilemma of China’s personal data protection position is unclear, which is manifested in the conflict between data localization and data liberalization, unbalanced personal data, cross-border data flow, and conflicts between national interests, incomplete domestic governance mechanisms, and foreign trade individuals The problem of limited data protection effectiveness. Therefore, the thesis hopes to find answers to the plight of personal data protection in international trade from the legislation and external experience of the European Union and the United States. Based on the current situation in China, on the basis of drawing on the experience of the European and American models, the thesis mainly studies two goals, namely, on the one hand, it establishes the overall position of China's participation in the protection of personal data in international trade, and on the other hand, it is a better implement your ideas in international trade and provide countermeasures and suggestions. Therefore, on the macro level, China should adopt a trade-led protection strategy based on data sovereignty based on national interests, implement different standards of personal data protection measures in terms of national interests, commercial interests, and individual legal rights. Provide relevant suggestions, such as narrowing the scope of application of the “assessment method” security assessment, clarifying the specific scope of key information infrastructure, etc., and clarifying the national position in external practice, by participating in WTO rules, strengthening bilateral and multilateral cooperation, etc. China’s voice is voiced in the formulation of international rules to safeguard China’s national interests.
· 없음