Background and Objectives With the growing acknowledgment of age-related vestibularimpairments, consensus diagnostic criteria for presbyvestibulopathy (PVP) have been recentlypublished. The PVP criteria retains its objectivity with video head impulse test (vHIT), rotatorychair test (RCT) and caloric test. These objective tests share testing principles, but targeted frequenciesvary across the tests. The PVP criteria are applicable for subjects of age over 60. However,there are different age cut-offs for older male in different areas. The purpose of the presentstudy was to explore whether the PVP diagnostic criteria were appropriate for early elderly(Eel) patients and to identify the most sensitive test for age-related loss of vestibular function.
Subjects and Method Eligible patients, aged 60 years or older, complained of dizziness forat least 3 weeks, and have undergone at least one of the followings: vHIT, RCT, or caloric test.
We selected two groups based on age: the Eel group (aged >60 years but <65 years) and the lateelderly (Lel) group (aged ≥75 years).
Results The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gains differed significantly between the Eel andLel groups for vHIT and caloric gain test. No Eel patient met the PVP criteria but 26.1% of Lelpatients met the criteria for vHIT, and the proportions of such patients in the two groups differedsignificantly.
Conclusion Eel subjects could be considered to differ from Lel subjects. Given the significanceof both averages, VOR difference and the proportional difference in terms of meetingthe PVP criteria and vHIT may be optimal when evaluating age-related changes.
자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
파일오류
중복자료
저작권 없음
설명과 실제 내용 불일치
파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우