각속도 변환과 운동 검사 방법에 따른 슬관절의 등속성 최대 각근력 비교 (The comparison of Isokinetic Knee Joint Peak Torque by Angular Velocity Modification and Test Protocols)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국스포츠학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국스포츠학회 / 12권 / 1호 / 601 ~ 609페이지
· 저자명 : 유건성, 이상현

초록

This study was aimed to compare isokinetic knee peak torque by angular velocity modification of traditional angular velocity (60-60°/sec) and isokinetic test protocol which isolated extensor(ER) and flexor(FR) as agonist and antagonist respectively. Twenty-five male university students were recruited as subjects. Subjects were performed two tests for the knee joint isokinetic peak torque tests through angular modification(60-60°/sec, 60-90°/sec, 60-120°/sec and 60-180°/sec) and order of agonist(extensor and flexor; protocol A) and antagonist(extensor and flexor; protocol B). Protocol A started at 60(ER)-60(FR)°/sec and continued the progressive 60°(ER)-90°(FR)/sec, 90(ER)-60(FR)°/sec, 60(ER)-120°(FR)/sec, 120(ER)-60(FR)°/sec, 60(ER)-180(FR)°/sec and 180(ER)-180(FR)°/sec which of dominant leg and non-dominant leg. protocol B started at 60(ER)-60(FR)°/sec and continued the progressive 60(FR)-90°(ER)/sec, 90(FR)-60(ER)°/sec, 60(FR)-120°(ER)/sec, 120(FR)-60(ER)°/sec, 60(FR)-180(ER)°/sec and 180(FR)-60(ER)°/sec. which of dominant leg and non-dominant leg. Angular velocity modification(60-60°/sec and 60(ER)-90(FR)°/sec) of protocol A may be available for knee joint extensor peak torque between dominant and non-dominant leg and 60(ER)-90(FR)°/sec has the lowest coefficient variance(CV). And angular velocity modification(60(FR)-90(ER)°/sec) of protocol B may be available for knee joint flexor peak torque between dominant and non-dominant. In conclusion, To test peak torque, angular velocity modification may be available for rehabilitation patient group and elderly group as well as health group.

영어초록

This study was aimed to compare isokinetic knee peak torque by angular velocity modification of traditional angular velocity (60-60°/sec) and isokinetic test protocol which isolated extensor(ER) and flexor(FR) as agonist and antagonist respectively. Twenty-five male university students were recruited as subjects. Subjects were performed two tests for the knee joint isokinetic peak torque tests through angular modification(60-60°/sec, 60-90°/sec, 60-120°/sec and 60-180°/sec) and order of agonist(extensor and flexor; protocol A) and antagonist(extensor and flexor; protocol B). Protocol A started at 60(ER)-60(FR)°/sec and continued the progressive 60°(ER)-90°(FR)/sec, 90(ER)-60(FR)°/sec, 60(ER)-120°(FR)/sec, 120(ER)-60(FR)°/sec, 60(ER)-180(FR)°/sec and 180(ER)-180(FR)°/sec which of dominant leg and non-dominant leg. protocol B started at 60(ER)-60(FR)°/sec and continued the progressive 60(FR)-90°(ER)/sec, 90(FR)-60(ER)°/sec, 60(FR)-120°(ER)/sec, 120(FR)-60(ER)°/sec, 60(FR)-180(ER)°/sec and 180(FR)-60(ER)°/sec. which of dominant leg and non-dominant leg. Angular velocity modification(60-60°/sec and 60(ER)-90(FR)°/sec) of protocol A may be available for knee joint extensor peak torque between dominant and non-dominant leg and 60(ER)-90(FR)°/sec has the lowest coefficient variance(CV). And angular velocity modification(60(FR)-90(ER)°/sec) of protocol B may be available for knee joint flexor peak torque between dominant and non-dominant. In conclusion, To test peak torque, angular velocity modification may be available for rehabilitation patient group and elderly group as well as health group.

참고자료

· 없음