PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

직유의 효과에 관한 새로운 이해 - 직유의 벡터와 그 작용을 중심으로 (A New Approach to the Effect of Simile : Focusing on the Vector of Simile and the Way It Works)

35 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.03.04 최종저작일 2005.09
35P 미리보기
직유의 효과에 관한 새로운 이해 - 직유의 벡터와 그 작용을 중심으로
  • 서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국수사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 수사학 / 3호 / 256 ~ 290페이지
    · 저자명 : 이아라

    초록

    This dissertation is a study of the similes, with a view to identifying the
    limits the existing view of the similes imposed on them and to presenting a
    new view of the similes on the basis of that identification.
    Not by unreliable, abstract theorizing but by examining ways and effects
    similes work in actual poems and by closely analyzing the similes in
    everyday life, this dissertation advances a new theory of the similes.
    Although they have long been recognized as a major rhetoric device, few
    in-depth studies of the similes have been made. Ever since Poetics and
    Rhetoric by Aristotle(BC 384~322), the study on the similes has been
    relegated to a part of the study of metaphors.
    After presenting the existing general views of the similes that 1) effects
    of the similes are clear and simple and the similes reinforce clarity and
    concreteness through enhanced imagery, 2) the similes are a lower rhetoric
    compared with the metaphors and, while the similes are primary expressions
    with less density, the metaphors are more refined expressions of higher level
    and 3) the similes and the metaphors are essentially the same and the former
    are amplification of the latter and the latter is a condensation of the former
    and, therefore, the former may be replaced with the later, this dissertation
    raised questions and sought to resolve them.
    This dissertation examined if the traditional view that the similes can be replaced with metaphors was true. Common similes in daily life and in the
    poems of Ki Hyungdo, Ryu Siwha and Kim Dongmyung have been
    extensively examined. As a result of this examination, it has been confirmed
    that meanings are changed when similes are replaced with metaphors.
    Because of the contrasting nature of the similes and the metaphors, such as
    vector (directionality) and naming (interpretation), and participation and
    possession, the similes can hardly be replaced with the metaphors. This
    experiment, in which the similes were replaced with metaphors, showed that
    poetic narrators' vectors have been lost and the poems were transformed into
    totally different ones.
    The similes induce the hearer to participate in the speaker's directionality.
    So the similes are persuasive.
    Through the study conducted in this dissertation it was found that the
    existing view that the similes are lower rhetoric compared with the metaphors
    was not correct. If the similes are considered lower rhetoric than the
    metaphors, simile-dominated poems would be of lower quality and, in order to
    upgrade the quality, the similes would be replaced with metaphors. However,
    there are many examples of good poems where the similes are main rhetoric
    and where the similes can not be replaced with the metaphors without
    changing the poems into different poems. What contributes to the making of
    good poems is not whether similes or metaphors are used but if they are
    used appropriately.
    Through many illustrations and evidence-based study, this dissertation
    establishes a new view of the similes and attains an in-depth understanding
    of poetry.

    영어초록

    This dissertation is a study of the similes, with a view to identifying the limits the existing view of the similes imposed on them and to presenting a new view of the similes on the basis of that identification.
    Not by unreliable, abstract theorizing but by examining ways and effects similes work in actual poems and by closely analyzing the similes in everyday life, this dissertation advances a new theory of the similes.
    Although they have long been recognized as a major rhetoric device, few in-depth studies of the similes have been made. Ever since Poetics and Rhetoric by Aristotle(BC 384~322), the study on the similes has been relegated to a part of the study of metaphors.
    After presenting the existing general views of the similes that 1) effects of the similes are clear and simple and the similes reinforce clarity and concreteness through enhanced imagery, 2) the similes are a lower rhetoric compared with the metaphors and, while the similes are primary expressions with less density, the metaphors are more refined expressions of higher level and 3) the similes and the metaphors are essentially the same and the former are amplification of the latter and the latter is a condensation of the former and, therefore, the former may be replaced with the later, this dissertation raised questions and sought to resolve them.
    This dissertation examined if the traditional view that the similes can be replaced with metaphors was true. Common similes in daily life and in the poems of Ki Hyungdo, Ryu Siwha and Kim Dongmyung have been extensively examined. As a result of this examination, it has been confirmed that meanings are changed when similes are replaced with metaphors.
    Because of the contrasting nature of the similes and the metaphors, such as vector (directionality) and naming (interpretation), and participation and possession, the similes can hardly be replaced with the metaphors. This experiment, in which the similes were replaced with metaphors, showed that poetic narrators' vectors have been lost and the poems were transformed into totally different ones.
    The similes induce the hearer to participate in the speaker's directionality.
    So the similes are persuasive.
    Through the study conducted in this dissertation it was found that the existing view that the similes are lower rhetoric compared with the metaphors was not correct. If the similes are considered lower rhetoric than the metaphors, simile-dominated poems would be of lower quality and, in order to upgrade the quality, the similes would be replaced with metaphors. However, there are many examples of good poems where the similes are main rhetoric and where the similes can not be replaced with the metaphors without changing the poems into different poems. What contributes to the making of good poems is not whether similes or metaphors are used but if they are used appropriately.
    Through many illustrations and evidence-based study, this dissertation establishes a new view of the similes and attains an in-depth understanding of poetry.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 04월 19일 토요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
6:28 오전