This paper, unlike previous generative works on English phonology (e.g. Chomsky and Halle 1968, Borowsky 1986 and Kenstowicz 1994), claims that the velar nasal can be a legitimate member of the English underlying phoneme inventory. In doing so, it shows that a better and more coherent theoretical analysis can be offered when angma(ŋ) is postulated to be an underlying phoneme than when it is not, to explain surface realizations of angma in English. This work delves into dynamic realizations in English dialects of the nasal and oral velar cluster. This paper also provides good ground to test classic Optimality Theory (OT) and Optimality Theory with Candidate Chains (OT-CC). It is shown here that classic OT, other things being equal, is comparatively better fit than OT-CC to account for the English dialectal realizations.
영어초록
This paper, unlike previous generative works on English phonology (e.g. Chomsky and Halle 1968, Borowsky 1986 and Kenstowicz 1994), claims that the velar nasal can be a legitimate member of the English underlying phoneme inventory. In doing so, it shows that a better and more coherent theoretical analysis can be offered when angma(ŋ) is postulated to be an underlying phoneme than when it is not, to explain surface realizations of angma in English. This work delves into dynamic realizations in English dialects of the nasal and oral velar cluster. This paper also provides good ground to test classic Optimality Theory (OT) and Optimality Theory with Candidate Chains (OT-CC). It is shown here that classic OT, other things being equal, is comparatively better fit than OT-CC to account for the English dialectal realizations.
자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
파일오류
중복자료
저작권 없음
설명과 실제 내용 불일치
파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우