축구감독의 권력기반에 대한 선수의 인식 (Soccer Coach Power and Authority as Recognized by Soccer Players)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국체육과학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국체육과학회지 / 22권 / 4호 / 1247 ~ 1258페이지
· 저자명 : 최옥진, 고기태

초록

The purpose of this study is to identify how soccer players recognize their head coach’s power and authority in relation to soccer players’ background and experiences and then to establish an effective base for head coaches’authority. The conclusions of the research and data analyses are as follows.
First, an examination of the soccer player’s recognition of a head soccer coach’s authority by their team affiliation showed significant differences in the soccer player’s perception in all areas of a coach’s authorities: compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power, consultation power, and reward power. While both consultation power and reward power are least recognized amongst adult soccer players; compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power are realized most amongst middle school soccer players. Second, in relation to the soccer player’s position, there was no substantial distinction on the perception in all areas of a coach’s authorities; while, a significant difference was seen on professional power amongst the adult division soccer players.
Third, an examination of the soccer player’s differential view of a head soccer coach’s authority, with reference to whether the player is a key player or not, was performed and found that the consultation power was most significant amongst the middle school key players as compared to non-key players. And significant differences were seen on both compulsory power and professional power amongst high school non-key players as opposed to key players. Fourth, in relation to the grades of soccer players, middle school quarter-final players in lower division teams recognized a coach’s reward power more than the middle school quarter-final upper division teams.
Both professional power and legitimate power were perceived more amongst high school quarter-final teams or upper division teams as compared to quarter-final or lower division teams. Fifth, between Korean soccer players and foreign soccer players, significant differences were evident in the perception of a coach’s authority in all areas of compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power, consultation power, and reward power of the coach.

영어초록

The purpose of this study is to identify how soccer players recognize their head coach’s power and authority in relation to soccer players’ background and experiences and then to establish an effective base for head coaches’authority. The conclusions of the research and data analyses are as follows.
First, an examination of the soccer player’s recognition of a head soccer coach’s authority by their team affiliation showed significant differences in the soccer player’s perception in all areas of a coach’s authorities: compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power, consultation power, and reward power. While both consultation power and reward power are least recognized amongst adult soccer players; compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power are realized most amongst middle school soccer players. Second, in relation to the soccer player’s position, there was no substantial distinction on the perception in all areas of a coach’s authorities; while, a significant difference was seen on professional power amongst the adult division soccer players.
Third, an examination of the soccer player’s differential view of a head soccer coach’s authority, with reference to whether the player is a key player or not, was performed and found that the consultation power was most significant amongst the middle school key players as compared to non-key players. And significant differences were seen on both compulsory power and professional power amongst high school non-key players as opposed to key players. Fourth, in relation to the grades of soccer players, middle school quarter-final players in lower division teams recognized a coach’s reward power more than the middle school quarter-final upper division teams.
Both professional power and legitimate power were perceived more amongst high school quarter-final teams or upper division teams as compared to quarter-final or lower division teams. Fifth, between Korean soccer players and foreign soccer players, significant differences were evident in the perception of a coach’s authority in all areas of compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power, consultation power, and reward power of the coach.

참고자료

· 없음