창의록 문헌의 변개 양상 -≪우산선생병자창의록≫과 ≪은봉선생창의록≫ 비교를 중심으로- (An Aspect of Modification in Changuirok(倡義錄) -A Focus on Comparison between Uusanseonsaeng Byeongja- Changuirok(牛山先生丙子倡義錄) and Eunbongseonsaeng Changuirok(隱峯先生倡義錄)-)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 국어국문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 국어국문학 / 164호 / 333 ~ 360페이지
· 저자명 : 신해진

초록

This study aims to examine aspects of modification in Changuirok(倡義錄) which recorded civilian army activity in Honam(湖南) during the period of the Manchu war of 1636.
More than 100 years past from war, Honam Changuiroks(湖南倡義錄) were for the first time organized and recorded based on memories and poor references till 1760s. Records were for civilian army activities and its central figures even though save-the-nation-movement was not successful. But many of them tended to focus on reverence for forebears rather than historical facts. There was some inclination to overanalyze patriotic martyrs as more prominent figures than what they were from the HyoJong(孝宗) to JoungJo(正祖) dynasty. Especially this tendency was marked in the descendants of Sunjeolja(殉節者) or Cheokwhapa(斥和派) and Seoin(西人) or Noron(老論) who were passed down the formers' academic tradition.
Whether they were true or not, the different versions of Changuiroks(倡義錄) were indiscriminately cited by researchers. So it is necessary to guarantee appropriacy of quotations and value through critical review of original materials. The comparison of the first version, Usanseonsaeng Byeongja- changuirok(牛山先生丙子倡義錄) and the second version, Eunbongseonsaen Changuirok(隱峯先生倡義錄) was the first step to verify an aspect of modifi- cations.
The conclusion is like this. An Bangjun(安邦俊) played the pivotal role. Some historical facts were modified to make him stands out from others. The process of modification made many kinds of versions regardless of actual events. In addition, personal goals which aimed to elevate the family name and the glory of descendants also caused a series of different versions. Consequently, it would appear from this that the first edition dealt with the subject of fact, whereas the second version focused on ancestor worship and pride of descendants.

영어초록

This study aims to examine aspects of modification in Changuirok(倡義錄) which recorded civilian army activity in Honam(湖南) during the period of the Manchu war of 1636.
More than 100 years past from war, Honam Changuiroks(湖南倡義錄) were for the first time organized and recorded based on memories and poor references till 1760s. Records were for civilian army activities and its central figures even though save-the-nation-movement was not successful. But many of them tended to focus on reverence for forebears rather than historical facts. There was some inclination to overanalyze patriotic martyrs as more prominent figures than what they were from the HyoJong(孝宗) to JoungJo(正祖) dynasty. Especially this tendency was marked in the descendants of Sunjeolja(殉節者) or Cheokwhapa(斥和派) and Seoin(西人) or Noron(老論) who were passed down the formers' academic tradition.
Whether they were true or not, the different versions of Changuiroks(倡義錄) were indiscriminately cited by researchers. So it is necessary to guarantee appropriacy of quotations and value through critical review of original materials. The comparison of the first version, Usanseonsaeng Byeongja- changuirok(牛山先生丙子倡義錄) and the second version, Eunbongseonsaen Changuirok(隱峯先生倡義錄) was the first step to verify an aspect of modifi- cations.
The conclusion is like this. An Bangjun(安邦俊) played the pivotal role. Some historical facts were modified to make him stands out from others. The process of modification made many kinds of versions regardless of actual events. In addition, personal goals which aimed to elevate the family name and the glory of descendants also caused a series of different versions. Consequently, it would appear from this that the first edition dealt with the subject of fact, whereas the second version focused on ancestor worship and pride of descendants.

참고자료

· 없음