The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the manual segmental evaluation and the automatic segmental evaluation of a set of English utterances from the same reference sentence. A model utterance from a native speaker of English was chosen based on which all the other utterances were evaluated. Two groups were chosen for evaluation. Fifty eight native speakers of English and one hundred fifty Korean female university students participated in the evaluation. The prosody of the model utterance was cloned to all the other utterances of the two groups. Since the prosodic aspect of the utterances was controlled, only the segmental aspect was then evaluated both by a human evaluator and by a Praat script. The script compared the sequential spectra between the model utterance and the others. The scores from the two evaluations were correlated with each other and this supports the idea that a manual segmental evaluation can be replaced by computer by performing automatic spectral comparisons.
영어초록
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between the manual segmental evaluation and the automatic segmental evaluation of a set of English utterances from the same reference sentence. A model utterance from a native speaker of English was chosen based on which all the other utterances were evaluated. Two groups were chosen for evaluation. Fifty eight native speakers of English and one hundred fifty Korean female university students participated in the evaluation. The prosody of the model utterance was cloned to all the other utterances of the two groups. Since the prosodic aspect of the utterances was controlled, only the segmental aspect was then evaluated both by a human evaluator and by a Praat script. The script compared the sequential spectra between the model utterance and the others. The scores from the two evaluations were correlated with each other and this supports the idea that a manual segmental evaluation can be replaced by computer by performing automatic spectral comparisons.
자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
파일오류
중복자료
저작권 없음
설명과 실제 내용 불일치
파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우