전통건축논의에서 나타나는 움직임의 담론적 이해 - 안영배의 「한국건축의 외부공간」을 중심으로 - (Understanding on the Movement in Discourse of Traditional Korean Architecture - Focused on Ahn Yung Bae’s 「Exterior Space in Traditional Korean Architecture」-)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국가구학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국가구학회지 / 24권 / 3호 / 293 ~ 301페이지
· 저자명 : 서정연

초록

Through 1960 and 1970s, there had been constant endeavor in order to succeed the korean traditional architectural heritages. Among those efforts Ahn Yung Bae's book [Exterior Space in Traditional Korean Architecture] presented unique methodology utilizing abstractionof space and movement of subject. His method doesn't refer traditional form of architecture. He ignores formal elements. Instead, he reads space through subject's movement and this reading act creates meaning of space. So, he constructed knowledge not about the object of traditional architecture but the subject of today. Ahn's book opens new discourse based on traditional korean architecture. His analyses didn't deal with the form of traditional space, but the experiences of observer. However many historical documents related to architecture had not been interpreted until nineties and the succession of heritage became to be broken by modernity through 20th century. In this situation his book showed the unavoidable method, that is, the modernization of tradition.

영어초록

Through 1960 and 1970s, there had been constant endeavor in order to succeed the korean traditional architectural heritages. Among those efforts Ahn Yung Bae's book [Exterior Space in Traditional Korean Architecture] presented unique methodology utilizing abstractionof space and movement of subject. His method doesn't refer traditional form of architecture. He ignores formal elements. Instead, he reads space through subject's movement and this reading act creates meaning of space. So, he constructed knowledge not about the object of traditional architecture but the subject of today. Ahn's book opens new discourse based on traditional korean architecture. His analyses didn't deal with the form of traditional space, but the experiences of observer. However many historical documents related to architecture had not been interpreted until nineties and the succession of heritage became to be broken by modernity through 20th century. In this situation his book showed the unavoidable method, that is, the modernization of tradition.

참고자료

· 없음