1990년대 이후 건축역사와 건축설계교육의 관계에 대한 연구 - 김승회와 최욱의 교육배경과 작업을 사례로 -
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.08.28
- 최종 저작일
- 2011.06
- 19페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 5,400원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국건축역사학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 건축역사연구 / 20권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 배형민, 우동선, 김봉렬, 전봉희, 이규철
목차
1. 서론
2. 1980년대 서양의 건축교육과1990년대 이후 해외파의 등장
2-1. 김승회와 최욱의 건축과 교육배경
2-2. 1990년대 이후 한국 건축계에서 해외파의 등장
2-3. 한국 현대건축에서 파편
3. 잠재적 모더니즘(Latent Modernism)
3-1. 최욱의 한옥 연작과 체계
3-2. 김승회 건축의 파편
3-3. 건축역사, 건축교육, 그리고 건축설계
4. 결론 - 미지의 세계, 그리고 지식의 안과 밖
참고문헌
Abstract
영어 초록
The goal of this paper is to analyze the relationship between pedagogy and the emergence of contemporary Korean architecture after the 1990s. For this purpose, the paper deals with the education and work of two important contemporary Korean architects, Kim Seung Hoy and Choi Wook. Kim and Choi were part of a group of young architects that went abroad in the 1980s to study at the centers of architectural education in Europe and the United States. Through their education and work, the paper discusses the relationship among education, history, and design practice in architecture. During their studies at Michigan University and IUAV in Venice, they were commonly influenced by Colin Rowe through their studios. In the case of Kim Seung Hoy, he was introduced to the Beaux Arts logic of the analytique and esquisse through the teaching of Steven Hurrt, a disciple of Colin Rowe. Choi Wook took studios that involved formal analysis and comparison of Palladio and Le Corbusier. The paper further analyzes their works in Korea by employing the concepts of fragments and systems, ignorance and knowledge. The paper concludes that, in Korean contemporary architecture, fragments and systems, ignorance and knowledge, lie in the middle of ongoing creative process that must distinguished from the West, where architectural history provides an established tradition of systematic knowledge.
참고 자료
없음