중국 道家의 無爲自然사상과 조선시대 民藝美의 공통적 특징에 대한 비교 연구
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국조형교육학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 조형교육 / 20권
ㆍ저자명 : 최병식
ㆍ저자명 : 최병식
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말Ⅱ. 중국미술사에서 無爲自然의 형성과 성격
Ⅲ. 한국미술의 無爲自然의 성격
Ⅳ. 조선시대 민예미와 無爲自然的 요소
Ⅴ. 조선시대 민예미와 중국미술에서의 無爲自然的 요소의 비교
Ⅵ. 결론
【참고문헌】
ABSTRACT
영어 초록
The viewpoints for Korean Folk Art(Minye, 民藝), studied until today, have been mostly focused on the rediscovery of distinctions, which differ from the aesthetic sense of the upper class in Korean Art including early Japanese. On the other hand, the comparative research about the originality and indigenity of Korean Art has been hardly achieved. Therefore, to be accomplished more objective and global assessment has such academic limits.This paper intends to help solving such problems with comparing the point of sameness throughout the comparison between the ideology of natural situation without artificial technique(無爲自然思想) suggested by Lao-Chuang(老壯者) in the Chinese Taojia(道家) and the Korean Folk Art(Minye, 民藝). Its system is based on the formation of the ideology of natural situation without artificial technique(無爲自然思想) in China, the accommodation of Taojia(道家) and ideology of natural situation without artificial technique(無爲自然思想) in Korea, opening Chinese art historical accommodation. Also, it orderly accomplished examining the factors of natural situation without artificial technique, discovered in Korean folk art by Chosun handicraftsmen.
Both also means to research the identity of Korean art quite a lot at the point of the ideology and artistic trend of thought, which the consequent distinctions appeared in the social background, ideological trends, or artworks at that time, were differently formed each other in between about 2000 years.
Korean folk art(Minye, 民藝) forms miraculous joining, at the point of, which Taojia(道家) stage of natural situation without artificial technique(無爲自然思想) reached a stage of farsighted view throughout technical training for a background of variously indigenous conditions, and then it accomplishes a world view, which is innocent and unintentional absolute nature. It is hardly founded at the upper class art of both Chinese and Korean art history. Such study is inferred as the important subject to establish not only Korean art history but also East Asian and global identity.
A Comparative Study about the Common Distinction of Chinese Taojia(道家)' Ideology of Natural Situation without Artificial Technique(無爲自然思想) and the Beauty of Korean Folk Art (Minye, 民藝)
참고 자료
없음태그
"조형교육"의 다른 논문
- 글쓰기활동이 미술표현활동에 미치는 영향 연구26페이지
- 유아 찰흙활동 지도방법에 관한 모색28페이지
- 북한미술 현황 연구20페이지
- 黃賓虹의 美術敎育 思想 硏究14페이지
- 통일교육을 위한 미술교과 교수 · 학습 방법 연구32페이지
- 미술교육의 새로운 과제: 현대 미술교육26페이지
- Arts Propel 교수학습 이론에 따른 한국불교미술문화 감상의 창의성 프로그램 모형27페이지
- 미국의 최근 사례로 본 인터넷을 활용한 미술교육20페이지
- 제6차와 제7차 미술과 교육과정 목표에 관한 연구16페이지
- 포트폴리오법을 활용한 중학교 미술과 평가 도구 개발34페이지