Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 분석 결과
Ⅳ. 한국의 학교폭력 예방 및 해결노력을 위한 연구의 함의
Ⅴ. 결론 및 함의
초록
The purpose of this study was to analyze on UK, US, Norway, and Germany’s experiences in preventing and solving problems of school bullying and identify the implications for developing policy and systems of anti-bullying in Korea. Through the literature review and many other resources, data were collected.
Integrative Service Analysis Model was applied for each country as the analysis tool. Analysis criteria included the purpose and objective, legal basis, delivery system, target objects, contents, and finance of the program and policy. The research result from this study were as follows: First, state or local governments had been formulated and carried the consistent policy, and taken primary responsibility for the school bullying problems. Second, the main purpose of school bullying policies was to protect students’ rights from the school bullying by fostering safe school environments. Third, the target of school bullying service was an ecological environment system surrounding a school, including students, parents, teachers, schools, and communities. Forth, multidimensional holistic approaches had been emphasized for the anti-bullying prevention and intervention services. Fifth, in terms of delivery system, the service provider in school bullying system was diverse according to countries such as state, local government, local office of education, or schools.
Finally, the government had main financial responsibility for operating school bullying prevention and intervention programs in most countries. Based on the results, several implications were described at both policy/institutional and program level for Korea.
영어초록
The purpose of this study was to analyze on UK, US, Norway, and Germany’s experiences in preventingand solving problems of school bullying and identify the implications for developing policy and systems ofanti-bullying in Korea. Through the literature review and many other resources, data were collected.Integrative Service Analysis Model was applied for each country as the analysis tool. Analysis criteria includedthe purpose and objective, legal basis, delivery system, target objects, contents, and finance of the programand policy. The research result from this study were as follows: First, state or local governments had beenformulated and carried the consistent policy, and taken primary responsibility for the school bullyingproblems. Second, the main purpose of school bullying policies was to protect students’ rights from theschool bullying by fostering safe school environments. Third, the target of school bullying service was anecological environment system surrounding a school, including students, parents, teachers, schools, andcommunities. Forth, multidimensional holistic approaches had been emphasized for the anti-bullying preventionand intervention services. Fifth, in terms of delivery system, the service provider in school bullying systemwas diverse according to countries such as state, local government, local office of education, or schools.Finally, the government had main financial responsibility for operating school bullying prevention andintervention programs in most countries. Based on the results, several implications were described at bothpolicy/institutional and program level for Korea.