영어독후감-문명의 충돌

목차

없음

본문내용

India gets too little ink, but concern about China seems overstated and premature. While in the long run (200 years) he is right about the likely eventual preeminence of China worldwide, his medium term (50 year) speculation is conditional on an unlikely concatenation of events in the shorter time frame. Huntington does not mention the crisis of an aging population China will confront as a result of its 'one child only' policy. In China succession is irregular and the continuity of government is neither routine or assured. The invisible hand of economics is still too restrained. The invisible hand of politics does not operate freely at all, limiting the resources from which the government can draw. Most fundamentally, China does not have a combination of legally established differential, proportional, and integral controls on society that in the West are exercised by executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. Until both hands are freed, China will be far from achieving its economic and political potential.

참고 자료

없음